Tags: 13
-
#111744 |
<br> This week’s newsletter announces the latest C-Lightning release, requests help testing a Bitcoin Core release candidate, describes discussions about simplified LN commitments using CPFP carve-out, and summarizes several top-voted questions and answers from the Bitcoin Stack Exchange. After all, using an exchange generally requires incorporating its wallet and trusting the security of its system. To store bitcoin in a paper wallet, users create a public wallet key and a private key and then print them out on paper. These explain the fundamentals of both proposals, guide students through actually using them, and then describe strategies for making optimal use of the features they add to Bitcoin. 70) which will need to add inputs to a transaction in order to be able to spend low-value UTXOs. 3814 allows the UTXO sweeper to add wallet inputs to a sweep transaction in order to ensure its output meets the dust limit. ● Upgrade to C-Lightning 0.7.3: this latest release adds support for a PostgreSQL backend, makes it possible to send funds directly to a particular address when closing a channel, and allows you keep visit your url HD wallet seed encrypted when lightningd isn’t running-plus many other features and several bug fixes. 3558 synthesizes a unified policy for any case where two particular nodes have multiple channels open between them and then uses this unified policy when considering routing through any of those channels.
3556 adds a new queryprob RPC that returns the expected probability that a payment would succeed given a particular source node, destination node, and payment amount. The person who initiates channel opening is responsible for paying this amount (as they are responsible for paying all fees in the current protocol), so they would probably like to keep it low-but the amount must be greater than most node’s minimum output amount (“dust limit”). What amount of bitcoin value to use for the anchor outputs. This week’s newsletter requests help testing a Bitcoin Core release candidate, summarizes continued discussion of LN anchor outputs, and describes a proposal for allowing full nodes and lightweight clients to signal support for IP address relay. What script to use for the anchor outputs. 49, this new opcode proposed by Jeremy Rubin would allow a script to ensure its funds could only be spent by a specified set of child transactions. IRC channel by Jeremy Rubin) revealed that many developers wanted to gain a better understanding of the current rules and how they might be improved. This will help implementers to identify flaws or sub-optimal requirements in the current proposals that might be missed by people who only read the documentation.<br>>
0), Binance Margin’s new dynamic interest rate system ensures interest rates always reflect current market conditions. For example, let’s say the fed decided to create a digital transport system similar to Bitcoin that could carry “real” money around… The solution is a fork of the bitcoin system. 4 Users can tell others or make public a bitcoin address without compromising its corresponding private key. Rarible users can gift or send collectibles to others. Adding new consensus rules to Bitcoin is something that should be done carefully-because it can’t be undone safely for as long as anyone’s bitcoins depend on those rules-so it’s in every user’s interest that a large number of technical reviewers examine the proposals for possible flaws before they are implemented and before users are asked to consider upgrading their full nodes to enforce the new rules. It’s not too shocking, therefore, that one of the release valves for investors was banned during that specific period. Before we go further, however, it’s important that we clear up some conceptual background. However, ZmnSCPxj describes why this might be unsafe given Wagner’s algorithm as described in last week’s newsletter. However, this is complicated by the script possibly needing to contain a unique pubkey which won’t be known by third parties, preventing them from being able to independently generate the witness script necessary to spend<br> <br>SH output.
Prior to this change, only the generatetoaddress RPC was available and it can only pay P2PKH, P2SH, or P2WSH addresses. 16943 adds a generatetodescriptor RPC that allows new blocks generated during testing (e.g. in regtest mode) to pay a script represented by an output script descriptor. The payment secret is generated by the receiver and included in their BOLT11 invoice. The spender includes this secret in the part of their payment that’s encrypted to the receiver’s key. Do not agree to any request to release crypto before confirming the receipt of the payment to avoid financial losses. For example, a spender could restrict the future receivers of a set of coins to just three addresses-any payment to any other address would be forbidden. For example, ZmnSCPxj’s nodelets proposal suggests Alice and Bob could jointly control funds through a single LN node using the aggregation of their keys, (A, B). In a separate schnorr-related topic, ZmnSCPxj wrote a post about the challenges of safely using the MuSig signature aggregation protocol with sub-groups. Their joint node could then open a channel to Charlie’s node, using MuSig aggregation there too, ((A, B), C). Then select the “Banks” option. The updated specification also now provides guidance on how to select numbers f<br>ustom record types.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.