[monicaellis3Participant December 8, 2023 at 6:27 PM Post count: 0]

#111697 |

<br> Binance Research provides institutional-grade analysis, in-depth insights, and unbiased information to all participants in the digital asset industry. When the receiver acknowledges that the money is available, the spender releases the information necessary for the receiver to claim the money. They act as an escrow for both sellers and buyers, capable of saving both fiat money and Bitcoins. Also, you can use our simple Bitcoin calculator and estimate the value of the exact amount of Bitcoins and other cryptocurrencies. Mark Erhardt: Yeah, with the simple variant where you do two or three times more, wouldn’t that be sort of a jamming vector? Bastien Teinturier: So basically jamming, there are two types of jamming, slow jamming and fast jamming, and those two types of jamming potentially and most likely need two different kinds of solutions. This is a very easy way to solve fast jamming, but the issue is that it has an impact on normal users as well, because if you’re a normal user, you try to make payments, you have a lot of failures before you actually get to the recipient, you will have paid upfront fees for failures that you may think are not your fault, not something you should be paying fo<br>p><br>p> At the same time, the civil rehabilitation proceedings – marking the first time a defunct business has been “rehabilitated” in Japan’s history – does not mean Mt. Gox itself will make a comeback. Whether both the party unilaterally closing the channel (the “local” party) and the other party (“remote”) should experience the same delay before being able to claim their funds, or whether they should each be able to negotiate during the channel creation process for the delay duration to use when they’re the remote party. We’ve spoken previously, over maybe six months a bunch of different times, about different kinds of channel jamming attacks: liquidity jamming attacks, which exhaust the capacities in channels; and HTLC jamming attacks, https://coin-viewer.com where the attacker attempts to take all the HTLC slots with a bunch of small payments. Bastien Teinturier: Yeah, and even if it was only 50% more or even 20% more, that could be considered jamming as well. Unlike traditional investments such as company shares, where price movements may well be influenced by the performance of the business, bitcoin has no underlying asset.
As it tracks price action that has already occurred, it’s a lagging indicator. It is a decentralized, distributed ledger that tracks the provenance of digital assets. But the harder thing to fix was the slow jamming issue, where you send an HTLC that takes a lot of liquidity, or a few HTLCs that take a lot of liquidity, and you just hold them for a very long time. We’ve had a few of those discussions over maybe six or nine months, and I’m curious how you all would summarize the jamming discussions from the LN Summit meeting. By doing so, within a few seconds, they successfully get bitcoin, which they have to transfer into their wallet and use accordingly. You have more risk that one of those shards will not get to the recipient because there’s a buggy node somewhere in the middle. But what’s interesting is that once we start having ideas, concrete ideas on how to do that local reputation, we can actually deploy it on our node in a shadow mode, where you will still relay all the HTLCs, but you will keep track of the reputation, and you will record the decision you would have made if we would have activated t<br>c<br>.
This way, we can let this run on the network for a while, evaluate how it works in real life, and once it’s in implementation, that way we can also start doing some research on regtest where we simulate networks where attackers are trying different kinds of behaviors and see how the local reputation algorithms work with those type of attacks. It’s really hard to find a good reputation algorithm that would seem to work. How Do Crypto Tokens Work? So, unless there’s obvious timing, amount, and expiry values that lets you know that this is actually the same payment, at least the cryptography of the secrets that are shared will not let you correlate those two payments. So, this is quite hard to do correctly, and there are proposals. There are two research papers that have proposals on how to do that by modifying the scripts that we use in the corresponding output in the commitment transaction. And also another issue with redundant overpayment is that you are actually, for the duration of your payment, using more liquidity of the network than what is required. So it’s like 100% of liquidity required, then 200%, then 300%. Whereas boomerang and spear allow you to do essentially fractions above a 100%, <br>hat right?